Sample Chapter 1 on Arbitrations
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
Arbitration, in the law, is a legal alternative to the
courts whereby the parties to a dispute agree to submit their respective
positions (through agreement or hearing) to a neutral third party (the
arbitrator(s)) for resolution. Since arbitration is based either upon contract
law or, in the case of international arbitration, the law of treaties, the
agreement between the parties to submit their dispute to arbitration is a
legally binding contract. All arbitral decisions are considered to be "final and
binding." This does not, however, void the requirements of law. Any dispute not
excluded from arbitration by virtue of law (e.g. criminal proceedings) may be
submitted to arbitration. Arbitration exists under both domestic and
international law, and arbitration can be carried out between private
individuals, between states, or between states and private individuals. In the
case of arbitration between states, or between states and individuals, the
Permanent Court of Arbitration and the International Center for the Settlement
of Investment Disputes (ICSID) are the prodominant organizations. Arbitration is
also used as part of the dispute settlement process under the WTO Dispute
Settlement Understanding. International arbitral bodies for cases between
private persons also exist, the International Chamber of Commerce Court of
Arbitration being the most important. The American Arbitration Association is a
popular arbitral body in the United States. Arbitration also exists in
international sport through the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Moreover,when
arbitration occurs under domestic law, either party to an arbitration may appeal
the arbitrator's decision to a court, however the court will generally not
change the arbitrator's findings of fact but will decide only whether the
arbitrator was guilty of malfeasance, or whether the arbitrator exceeded the
limits of his or her authority in the arbitral award or whether the award
conflicts with positive law. Some jurisdictions have instituted a limited grace
period during which an arbitral decision may be appealed, but after which there
can be no appeal. In the case of arbitration under international law, a right of
appeal does not in general exist, although one may be provided for by the
arbitration agreement, provided a court exists capable of hearing the appeal.
Some domestic jurisdictions have stipulated that judges may require either
arbitration or mediation of certain disputes as a first step toward resolution,
familiy law (particularly child custody) being a prime example. Arbitrators are
not bound by precedent and have great leeway in such matters as: active
participation in the proceedings, accepting evidence, questioning witnesses, and
deciding appropriate remedies. Arbitrators may visit sites outside the hearing
room, call expert witnesses, seek out additional evidence, decide whether or not
the parties may be represented by legal counsel, and perform many other actions
not normally within the 23purview of a court. It is this great flexibility of
action which, combined with costs usually far below those of traditional
litigation, makes arbitration so attractive. No definitive statement can be made
concerning the credentials or experience levels of arbitrators, although some
jurisdictions have elected to establish standards for arbitrators in certain
fields. Several independent organizations offer arbitrator training programs,
such as the American Arbitration Association, and thus in effect, credentials.
Generally speaking, however, the credibility of an arbitrator rests upon
reputation, experience level in arbitrating particular issues, or
expertise/experience in a particular field. Arbitrators are generally not
required to be members of the legal profession. A growing trend among employers
whose employees are not represented by a labor union is to establish an
organizational problem-solving process, the final step of which consists of
arbitration of the issue at point by an independent arbitrator. Most collective
bargaining agreements in organizations where employees are represented by a
labor organization stipulate that the final step of any grievance procedure
shall consist of arbitration. To ensure effective arbitration and to increase
the general credibility of the arbitral process, arbitrators will sometimes sit
as a panel, usually consisting of three arbitrators. Often the three consist of
an expert in the legal area within which the dispute falls (such as contract law
in the case of a dispute over the terms and conditions of a contract), an expert
in the industry within which the dispute falls (such as the construction
industry, in the case of a dispute between a homeowner and his general
contractor), and an experienced arbitrator. Arbitration is a device whereby the
settlement of a question, which is of interest for two or more persons, is
entrusted to one or more other persons, the arbitrator or arbitrators, who
derive their powers from a private agreement, not the authority of a State, and
who are to proceed and decide the case on the basis of such an agreement.
Moreover, arbitration has also been defined as a mechanism for the settlement of
disputes between parties, either by a person appointed by themselves or by
relying upon procedures or institutions chosen by the parties. In his definition
of arbitration, Robert highlights the similarity between arbitration and
litigation: "Arbitration means instituting a private jurisdiction by which
litigations are withdrawn from the public jurisdictions, in order to be resolved
by individuals vested, for a given case, with the powers to judge such
litigations.'' Background of the Study In this time and age, transactions are
often take place through the World Wide Web. Commercial transactions conducted
on this medium are labelled as e-commerce. Nevertheless, with the purpose for
e-commerce to persist to flourish, legal confidence should subsist such that
commercial transactions completed online will be put in force in the physical
world. A dependable and enforceable dispute resolution mechanism customized
exclusively to the needs of the e- commerce milieu would assist in the progress
of such officially authorized certainty. Proposed solutions on online dispute
includes online alternative dispute resolution (ADR) intuitions that assimilate
either a mediation or arbitration model, or some sort of combination of the two.
As noted earlier, the idea of taking legal action in a foreign jurisdiction
under foreign rules is taken rather anxiously by all businesses engaged in
international transactions, including those now partaking in online ventures.
The best solution historically for the resolution of international commercial
disagreements has been conventional ADR services. As stated earlier, ADR is
normally speedy, efficient and confidential. Nevertheless, it is inappropriate
for settling online commercial disputes, predominantly for the reason that legal
revolution have insulated in the wake of the changes in the social,
technological, and commercial mores of cyberspace. Moreover, creative
entrepreneurs and academics have thus devised dispute resolution programs on the
web. The aptitude to play a part in an online proceeding of this category
generates a freer market for dispute resolution, a market unfettered by anxiety
of locality or time. The accessibility of online arbitration services enables
parties at anyplace and at any time to commence or take action to a petition by
accessing a website and finishing electronic forms that steer them through the
numerous stages of the course of action. Moreover, the individual parties are
able to become accustomed to the process particularly to their precise needs and
utilize multimedia technology to conserve time and money. This sleek and
collectively obtainable process diminishes entry impediments to arbitration for
businesses and individual parties, providing a new means of access to justice.
Initially, the individual factions on the web more often wouldn’t have seen each
other in the physical world considering they live actually in different nations
or continents. In the real world, common consumers do habitually not go into an
international agreement. On the other hand, in the Internet, they would have
taken advantage of small transactions, which is unusually for them considering
they would have second thoughts in acquiring assets in the physical world. As
stated earlier in this chapter courts normally are slow and expensive.
Furthermore, courts are considered as a financially irrational channel to
resolve disagreement arising from the World Wide Web. The factions to such small
or medium-sized disagreements in the web will time and again have hardwearing
economic enticement not to pursue court proceedings, leaving the fraudulent
party with a victory. Additionally, online arbitration could provide this
effectiveness, because the alternative to legal actions in courts is barely
negligible and therefore much less costly. Nevertheless, difficulties follow
from this form of legal effectiveness. Online arbitration compels the factions
to give up some of their liberties, which does not stimulate faith and which is
the motive why arbitration at present still deal with a sequence of legal
hindrances. In terms of the claims of the consumer, there is for instance a
predicament of arbitrability beneath a quantity of regulations. Though it is
acceptable that most of these legal hindrances are simply errors in the legal
system these obstacles are still there. The international market offered by
e-commerce creates peril that may be taken in hand by incorporating arbitration
clauses in online contracts. Introducing numerous customers one click far from
carrying out a business deal that generates the risk of thousands of consumers
putting on record lawsuits in their domestic locations or a fusion in a class
action lawsuit. The process of arbitration occurs when a third party is chosen
by the parties involved, or proposed by the institution selected by the
factions, provides a decision on a case while applying fundamental procedural
principles. Conventionally, similar to traditional arbitration, its online
counterpart resolves a dispute by making a practical decision. This is what is
labelled as the binding form of arbitration. It is a procedure where judgments
are enforceable by the powers that be. The philosophy of binding arbitration
online is that it comprises a mode of private judging, a substitute for court
litigation. Thus, in the milieu commerce in the World Wide Web, arbitration's
supplementary remuneration of guaranteeing an adjacent medium for resolution of
the dispute and eliminating the presence of class action lawsuit stand up to
added importance. Online arrangements may take account of an arbitration
stipulation with a forum assortment clause and a preference of law clause.
Statement of the Problem The researcher finds the necessity for a study that
specifically tackles the impact of online arbitration the advancement of
technology. Specifically, this study intends to understand the effect of online
arbitration on the community, judicial system, technology and the business
itself. It will also try to fill in the difference, advantages and disadvantages
between traditional arbitration and online arbitration. Moreover, this paper
intends to answer the following queries: 1. What is arbitration? 2. What are the
related factors in traditional and online arbitration? 3. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of traditional arbitration? 4. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of online arbitration? 5. What are the related
current issues in arbitrations? 6. How can we improve the online arbitration?
Hypothesis of the Study This paper will work on the following hypothesis: o
There is a significant difference between online arbitration and traditional
arbitration in terms of their performance. o There is a significant difference
between online arbitration and traditional arbitration in terms of their
advantages and disadvantages. Significance of the Study This study will be a
significant endeavor in promoting online arbitration by exposing the biases
between traditional arbitration and online arbitration in terms of practicality,
effectiveness and performance. It is true that these Moreover, this study will
be helpful to the Internet user, researchers, educators, and business
practitioners in training and informing them in the area of arbitration. It will
help them in formulating social responsibility policies, objectives, and
strategies. It will also serve as a future reference for researchers on the
subject of arbitration. And importantly, this research will educate individuals
in doing businesses in the Internet. Scope and Delimitation This paper shall
attempt to determine the impact of online arbitration to the current state of
the community. Moreover, the literature covering the area of arbitration, the
overview of Internet businesses and policies related in arbitration will be
discussed. References: David, R. (1985) Arbitration in International Trade .
Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers. Katsh, E.,
Rifkin, J., Gaitenby, A., (2000) E-commerce, E-Disputes, and E-Dispute
Resolution in the Shadow of eBay law, Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution,
No. 15 , pp.705 Katsh, E., (2000) New frontier. Online ADR becoming a global
priority, in Dispute Resolution Magazine, winter, pp..6. Lalive, P., (1999)
Towards a Decline of International Arbitration?, The Journal of the Chartered
Insitute of Arbitrators, No. 4. Lasprogata, G. (2001) Virtual Arbitration:
Contract Law and Alternative dispute resolution, Journal of Legal Studies
Education Vol. 19 No. 107 Robert, J. (1967) Arbitrage: Civil et Commercial .
Dalloz, Paris. Robert, J. and Carbunneau, T. (1983) The French Law of
Arbitration. Matthew Bender, New York. Vahrenvald, A. (2000) Out of Court
dispute settlement systems for e-commerce, Report on legal issues, Joint
Research Centre of the EC, Ispra (Italy), 29th May van den Horen, H. (1984)
"Commercial Disputes and Their Settlement: A Factor in Business Planning" in
International Arbitration: 60 Years of ICC Arbitration--A Look at the Future .
ICC Publishing, Paris.
No comments:
Post a Comment